MCP Index
Official MCPGenerally availablePublishes llms.txt

Arcade MCP Server

Capable, but hard to hand over unsupervised.

Closest competitor to Composio, with a sharper focus on the authorization problem and on building your own MCP servers properly.

Automation & iPaaS
4/5

Agent-readiness

Good overall

Weighted across four pillars

Reach4.5
Cost5
Control2
Trust4.5
Official MCP Server
Visit Website
0 views · 0 clicks

What an agent can do here

Tool-calling platform that handles per-user authorization for agents, exposing authenticated tools over MCP.

Action depth
Core write

Agents can do the product’s core job — edit the timeline, ship the deploy, update the record.

Hosting
Vendor-hosted

Connect with a URL — nothing to install.

Auth
OAuth
Unattended
Needs a human

Interactive OAuth only — it cannot be provisioned without someone clicking through.

Blast radius
High

A wrong call is expensive, public, or irreversible.

Permission scoping: Partial scopes

What it costs to let an agent act

FreeUnmetered

Free developer tier; production pricing by tool calls and users.

How the score breaks down

Every factor below is scored by a fixed rubric, not by opinion — so two tools with the same shape always get the same number.

Reach

Excellent4.5/5

Can an agent actually do the job?

  • MCP serverFirst-party2/2
  • Action depthCore write1/1.5
  • HostingVendor-hosted1/1
  • Fallback pathAPI + CLI0.5/0.5

Cost

Excellent5/5

What does it cost to let the agent act?

  • Plan requiredFree3/3
  • Usage meteringUnmetered2/2

Control

Limited2/5

Can I let it run unattended?

  • Permission scopingPartial scopes1/1.5
  • Unattended authHuman OAuth0/1.5
  • Blast radiusHigh0.5/1.5
  • Auth frictionOAuth0.5/0.5

Trust

Excellent4.5/5

Will this still work next month?

  • MaintainerVendor2/2
  • MaturityGenerally available1.5/1.5
  • Research confidenceMedium0.5/1
  • FreshnessVerified 2d ago0.5/0.5

Arcade vs other automation & ipaas tools

Sorted by overall score. Filter and sort the full category →

Automation & iPaaS MCP servers compared
ToolOverallReachCostControlTrustCost to actCan doRisk
n8nGoodThe self-hosting escape hatch: no per-call metering, full write access, and your data never leaves your infrastructure. You run it, you patch it.
4
4.5
5
2.5
5
FreeUnmeteredAdminHeadlessHighblast radius
PipedreamGoodBest value in the category: Zapier-scale coverage, managed OAuth so you never handle third-party tokens, and free for personal use.
4
4.5
5
2
5
FreeUnmeteredCore writeNeeds a humanHighblast radius
ComposioGoodAimed at builders shipping agents to their own users — the auth-per-end-user problem is the thing it actually solves.
4
4.5
5
2
5
FreeUnmeteredCore writeNeeds a humanHighblast radius
ArcadeGoodClosest competitor to Composio, with a sharper focus on the authorization problem and on building your own MCP servers properly.
4
4.5
5
2
4.5
FreeUnmeteredCore writeNeeds a humanHighblast radius
MakeGoodBest when the scenario already exists and you want an agent to fire it — less direct than Pipedream for ad-hoc tool calls.
4
4.5
4
2.5
4.5
FreeUsage-meteredCore writeHeadlessHighblast radius
ZapierGoodBreadth no first-party server can match, priced per action. The two-tasks-per-call maths is the thing to check before wiring it into a loop.
3.5
4.5
2.5
2
5
Paid planUsage-meteredCore writeNeeds a humanHighblast radius

Reviews

Write a review

Please log in to leave a review

Log In

Setup

How we know

Last verified
2026-09-29 · 2d ago
Research confidence
medium
Maturity
Generally available

Spotted something wrong? Send a correction — vendor corrections are applied first.

Official MCP
Visit Website